Education is about sharing knowledge, social networking for teaching and learning and for accreditation and assessment. Technology today can indeed make it easier to make education more accessible and affordable for all people. A student today has the ability to sit in on a class via the Internet from MIT and in the very next hour shift to another class from Stanford, and so on. This opens up the world of possibilities for certain learners who would never have had such opportunities. However, I could not help but ask myself who is this really benefitting? Is the average person, who struggling for a job and has no time or money for a traditional education going to be truly motivated to go on a quest to seek out knowledge from these institutions, however prestigious they may be, without the prospect of any reward or monetary incentives down the road. Are the types of learners that this system (of free learning, free access) claims to potentially help through the attainment of knowledge even prepared to benefit from such a system? How can students who can barely able to finish high school be expected to thrive as self-learner in an online environment?
Organizations like the KhanAcademy are indeed attempting to bridge the gap between the rich and underprivileged students by offering now free instructional videos, practice for various topics and interactive test prep, services which underprivileged students were traditionally lock out of. In 2015 in partnership with the College Board they are planning free test prep software to help all students get ready for the SAT test.
Another angle to consider are the online learning institutions that accept all students for a price. They wave around the prospect of the degree no matter what your background is in a short amount of time at a very high cost. They calculatingly even provide their version of financial aid, which equates usually to loans for their high price tuition. and in the environment of these online schools, it is pay to play where you pay first and play at your own will. The problem with this is that many of the accepted applicants are by no means prepared for the rigors of the coursework they are faced with and inevitably discontinue their enrollment and are simply left with staggering debt. Is this what we mean by accessible education for all?
Teach Now (my personal “favorite”) offers 9 months long course to get Master’s degree and teacher certification all for only $23,800. According to their website their program prepares teachers “to think digital who can create ways to educate with smartphones instead of taking them away””
University of Phoenix – offers hundreds different degrees with an average 4 year degree cost of $66,340…
Joshua, Pamela, and Aleksandra,
I can’t agree more that one of the biggest differences between those companies and universities who truly aspire to bring learning into the homes and computers of those who want it and those for-profit organizations who are big on promises and fall short on delivery is the motivation and probably their life and business philosophies. I personally signed up for MOOC’s twice; never finished. There is something about the depersonalized structure of the massive online course, with all its inappropriate automatics reposes which signal that the system is not even aware about my course activity, that drives me away. I missed 3 assignments and have not contributed to the discussion, but the MOOC kept sending me “thank you” notes for my valuable contributions to the class. I wonder what was so valuable in the contributions that never existed?)))
But maybe it’s just me. I am a stickler for in-person communication as one of the significant elements of learning. So hybrid course is as far as I am willing to go, and even that is a bit difficult. As we discussed in class, there is a difference between teaching technology and substituting the teacher with technology.
One of my best friends, who lives in Minsk, on the other hand, takes MOOC’s all the time and is very happy with them. It allows her to improve her english, experience different education system, and learn from ivy league professors. But as Pamela pointed out, my friend is a part of that small self-selected population for whom MOOCs work. She is highly educated, with a set of self-managment and study skills that allow her to productively engage with a mostly self-guided course, such as MOOC. Well, she learned all those skills through her in-person education.
So I guess my take away from thinking about “do-it-yourself education” is that it works for those who know how to learn and self-manage in the first place. These skills, however, have to be learned somewhere. Whose job is it to teach them then? What about those who never got a chance to learn them? As per for-profits, don’t even get me started…
I was also wondering about who some online learning is really targeting. I like the idea of “edupunks,” but reading the book really makes me feel like it is targeting a small, self-selecting audience. It seems like a great guide, but do the majority of people who are trying to learn using the internet start with a book about learning on the internet? Or do they just jump in? I would bet that most people just start looking for info about online education and they run into those questionable for-profit schools before they run into more reliable resources.